RSS

Idle thoughts on New Testament chronology

10 Jul

There are heaps of disputes in this field, but Wikipedia does provide a reasonable consensus — that is, with lots of + or – twenty years in there… Now my idle thought was to imagine Jesus was born the same year I was: no, I am not having an attack of Messianic delusion!

OK, if he had been, the crucifixion would have happened, very aptly some Aussies may think, around 1975!

So when did the earliest Christian writings — that is, some of the epistles attributed to Paul — appear? Answer: in the early 1990s. Paul didn’t know Jesus personally, of course, Damascus road vision apart. Still, it is not hard to conceive, given my analogy, that just as plenty of people could remember Gough in, say, 1995 — he of course stayed on earth after his “crucifixion”, which makes this easier — there would have been plenty around Palestine, Galilee and Syria in Paul’s time who had connections. (Perhaps we could substitute Paul Keating for Paul in our analogy? I suspect there are similarities…)

As for the gospels, leaving aside the hypothetical “Q”, which no longer exists, the usual candidate for earliest one is Mark, which in my analogy appears around about now — 2005-2010. By 2040 you have the Gospel of John, and a whole heap of others that didn’t make it into the New Testament, such as the Didache, I Clement and the Epistle of Barnabas.

I find this helps get my head around the implications of the various arguments about Christian origins.

Site Meter

Advertisements
 

Tags:

One response to “Idle thoughts on New Testament chronology

  1. Davo

    July 11, 2007 at 8:28 am

    Interesting perspective, Neil. It is, of course – in the days since Gutenberg, where every detail of even trivial people are faithfully recorded in print – very easy to forget that there are (were) so few records of the specific time.

    While recognising that existing records from that era are extremely rare, it has occurred to me to wonder whether Yeshua (Jesus) and all his close acquaintances were completely illiterate. Did they not care enough to write something down AT THE TIME, and preserve it for posterity?

    I find it curious that it not until we get to Saul (Paul) [and from my perspective, find his motives very suspect] that we see any attempt to “preserve” the stories.

     
 
%d bloggers like this: